With the immigration of new settlers into Alaska, new capitalist economic systems were introduced and the older subsistence economies could not successfully compete. In a capitalist economy, goods and services are produced by people who sell their labor to a tiny group who owns the means of production. Under capitalism, the means of production most commonly mean the factories, tools, equipment, land, animals, energy, trucks, railroads, and craft knowledge (intellectual capital). And only a small fraction of the people actually involved in production and distribution own these things. They use their ownership in these things (capital) to produce profit for themselves. Local knowledge, local crafts, local culture, local labor--these things are now said to be commoditized, or sold to make profit for the owners of the means of production (capitalists).
Today, most of Alaska is characterized by what sociologists call mixed economies: there are still some elements of subsistence economies that are left-over from earlier days, but markedly transformed by the influences of capitalism. In rural Alaska, one can still see how important subsistence economic systems are to the people, while at the same time, one can see how capitalism has reshaped the very way rural people even think about their economies.
In this section, the students will explore the various local economies of rural Alaska. Some of the questions we will examine include:
- how have extraction industries, such as gold, coal, and copper mining, oil production, whaling, and timber affected local communities? How have local economies been affected? Are the benefits and costs of extraction industries equitably distributed across rural Alaska?
- how has commercialized fishing (especially factory trawlers for cod, halibut, and salmon) affected local fishing economies? What rural Alaska communities are especially affected?
- in what Alaska communities do subsistence economies continue to thrive? What communities have adopted mostly capitalist economic structures?
- how has the building of US military bases affected rural Alaska economies?
- what are some new, emerging economic possibilities for rural Alaska? In particular, see if you can find out how medicine and healthcare facilities, craft guilds, industrial prisons, university annex campuses, and eco-tourism may have affected local Alaska economies.
- how bright (or dim) is rural Alaska's economic future?
Alaska Village Initiatives
ReplyDeleteDeveloped in 1968 as a way to finance a small co-op store in the village of Manokatak, Alaska Village Initiatives has now developed into a self-supporting corporation, representing more than 50,000 rural Alaskans. Its mission is to promote the economic well-being of Rural Alaskans through economic development, assistance, networking advocacy, and education.
From their yearly Rural Small Business Conference held in Anchorage Alaska that allows for networking and business development, to professional services that helps train, plan, and grow small businesses in rural Alaska, this organization is an important part of the economic development in these small isolated areas.
http://www.akvillage.com/shop/scripts/home.asp
Alaska's Economies and Subsistence from the Alaska Department of Fish and Games Division of Subsistence
ReplyDelete"The mission and core services of the ADF&G Division of Subsistnce center on research about how Alaskans harvest and use subsistence resources. Understanding subsistence resource use means understanding subsistence economies."
Mixed economies are common especially in rural Alaska. These economies depend on harvesting natural resources, such as fish and wild game, as well a having a cash component. It is a misconception among many that money isn't involved in the subsistence lifestyle, however money is an integral part to keeping this lifestyle sustainable for its members: providing a means to invest in the tools for subsistence hunting, fishing, and gathering.
Another common misconception is that subsistence is a welfare system for people with low incomes. The research by the Division of Subsistence has found that households with the highest incomes in rural communities often produce more wild foods than households with lower incomes. Households that produce more, share with those who do not. "Sharing subsistence-caught fish and wildlife is a fundamental characteristics of communities that follow a subsistence way of life."
The economies in rural Alaska are an integral blend of subsistence and cash economy. For more information on subsistence economies in Alaska, visit the Division of Subsistence Technical Paper and Special Publication series.
http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/home/library/pdfs/subsistence/ak_economies_subsistence.pdf
Sea Grant from UAF for Planning a Village Fish Processing Plant
ReplyDeleteThis handbook gives advice about planning a fish processing plant in a Alaska village. It discusses important questions to answer before a processing plant is built.
http://seagrant.uaf.edu/map/fishbiz/pubs/village/villagefishplant.pdf
The Red Dog Mine is a major mine in Alaska near Kotzebue. A large proportion of the employees at Red Dog Mine are locals as shown in the following pdf: http://www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu/Publications/2012_04-reddogworkingpaper2012-2.pdf.
ReplyDeleteHere is a link to a description of the cooperation between NANA and Tek Alaska, Inc.
http://nana.com/regional/resources/red-dog-mine/
Here is a link with some more information on the mine.
http://www.infomine.com/minesite/minesite.asp?site=reddog
Here is the Red Dog Mine official website: http://www.reddogalaska.com/Generic.aspx?PAGE=Red+Dog+Site%2fAbout+Red+Dog&portalName=tc
Here is an article on rural alaskan economies. Basically, as a result of low incomes and tradition, the economy in rural Alaska is based on both subsistence and work. Unemployment is a major issue in rural Alaska. The income per capita in rural Alaskan communities is lower than that for all of Alaska. The following article shows that a large proportion of income in rural Alaskan communities comes from the government.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu/Publications/researchsumm/UA_RS10.pdf
http://www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu/Publications/presentations/2012_02-Introduction_to_Economy_of_Alaska.pdf
ReplyDeleteThis PDF is a huge eye-opener to the impact of federal/military spending on Alaska's economy. It is "estimated that 1/3 Alaska jobs depend- directly or indirectly- on federal spending." Of that spending, approximate 40% was defense-related in 2010. In 2006, there were approximately 23,000 active duty military personnel in Alaska, which accounted for an entire 7% of jobs in the state. There is also a very interesting graph which details the percentage of jobs in Alaska which are active duty military positions from 1969 to 2005. In 1959, the military could boast 35% of Alaska's jobs. The decrease in military presence in Alaska over time has been the result of numerous factors: growth in non-military industries, less need for defense in Alaska, and the growing federal deficit. With more non-military jobs making up the economy, military jobs have accounted for a smaller percentage of the total number of jobs in Alaska. Furthermore, with troops withdrawing from Afghanistan and Iraq, there is less need for a defense system in Alaska to be close to those areas. Lastly, the looming federal deficit has led to a desperate need for spending cuts, so there has been less federal money to spend in Alaska (and everywhere else).
http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr734.pdf
ReplyDeleteThis report from the USDA focuses on the small town of Hoonah in the Southeastern region of Alaska. In addition to other topics, there is a section on economic trends. Commercial fishing has been a major part of Hoonah's economy, with a combination of subsistence and wage-earning providing income for most residents. There has been concern regarding the decline of commercial fishing in the area due in part to federal regulation of the industry in recent years. This has been the result of lack of regulation in the past, which caused over-fishing and population depletion. Another cause of the decline in the industry has been the rising cost of equipment, insurance, and permits, which prevents new fishermen to venture into commercial fishing.
So here is some information on food sharing in rural Alaska. This first link, is a comparative analysis of food sharing using qualitative and quantitative data, focusing on 2 communities in the North Slope. By Marcy Okada. 2010 UAF.
ReplyDeleteThis thesis looked at food sharing in Wainwright and Kaktovik, and while providing excellent data on who community members say they share with, it also compares the data from qualitative and quantitative research on the issue from the same communities, which I think is valuable for quality research. Some interesting themes from the paper; many people defined a family as "needy" if there was no hunter present in the family;, sharing caribou includes the whole hunting party (and whoever helps process meat), even if someone never fired a shot; a caribou hunted by a single hunter is not expected to be shared with anyone but the hunter's household; people can help in various ways to access bowhead whale, whether by loaning guns, buying fuel for the hunters etc, in order to receive a share if they are unable to help harvest, or they can help cook the big meal for the community while the butchering is going on and they will receive a share; with walrus, the boat owner using gets the valuable tusks, but the meat is shared equally.
A more quantitative and circumpolar resource on living conditions is the SLica study. The survey of living conditions in the Arctic is full of tables, on pages 5-8 there is a list of subsistence activities by circumpolar country, tables of mixed economy involvement and household income. This data says that "looking at the perceived share of meat and fish consumed by the household that is traditional food, there is again no evidence of a relationship between subsistence and income". This seems counter-intuitive, because subsistence costs fuel, time, and requires access to boats, nets, snowmachines etc, but I think this is an example of how sharing resources in rural communities helps mitigate these high costs.
Mixed Economies: Network Analysis This is a slideshow from 2011 by the Division of Subsistence and provides some useful information, especially that 30% of families provide 70% of the subsistence harvest.
ReplyDeleteI'm focusing on subsistence and mixed economy research for this section because I think hunting and gathering is an integral part of rural Alaska that needs to be supported. We have learned that livestock production is a near-impossibility, so working with what rural Alaska already has makes sense.
There's lots of images of network data, showing resources into a specific household, salmon into a specific community, etc. The spatial network view illustrates how complex sharing is. Or maybe sharing isn't that complex at all, it only is when we try to quantify and document what is natural to a community.